Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Blaz Rola vs Daniel Paty Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rola vs Paty analysis and find out who is favored!
Blaz Rola vs Daniel Paty Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rola 0 - 0 Paty
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rola has won 50.3% of points on their second serve, while Paty has won 55.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rola, in recent form, has won 50.28% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paty has won 46.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.32% and 36.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rola has saved 52.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paty has saved 58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rola has won 67.86% of matches played (W/L 19/ 9), with Paty winning 59.57% (W/L 28/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rola has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 307/ 170), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 26/ 31). Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 98/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Rola has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 11/ 7), where as Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.57% of matches (W/L 28/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rola has played against opponents with an average rank of 316.71 while Paty has played against players with an average rank of 130.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rola has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paty has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rola has converted 54.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paty has converted 41.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
488
Rank
78
High
33
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
674
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
60% (441-295)
Career Total W/L
54% (112-97)
67% (4-2)
YTD W/L
62% (8-5)
$373,455
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Blaz Rola vs Daniel Paty For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Rola VS Paty
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blaz Rola | Daniel Paty |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (4/2) | 62% (8/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 64% (18/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (83/65) | 55% (145/118) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 62% (8/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 80 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:19 | 1:26:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 138.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (286/453) | 59% (445/758) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (196/286) | 77% (342/445) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (84/167) | 56% (174/313) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (29/53) | 42% (34/81) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (215/489) | 40% (350/872) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (4/1) | 62% (8/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 62% (8/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (4/0) |
Blaz Rola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Mathys Erhard
Player
Blaz Rola
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
6
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Blaz Rola
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Emile Hudd
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Jiri Barnat
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Gregor Ramskogler
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Eero Vasa
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Blaz Rola
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(11) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Nick Ihlenfeld
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Daniel Paty
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Bruno Kokot
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Szymon Kielan
Player
Daniel Paty
44%
(
54 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
57%
(
40 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
48 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Jasza Szajrych
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Mariano Tammaro
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Matthias Ujvary
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Aljaz Jeran
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Paty
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rola Vs Paty Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rola are available here and Paty photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
